Grievances

Addresses a despotic state government that uses mercenary economics and unconstitutional privilege to ignore and replace the Rule of Law with actions that victimize classes of people while exploiting taxpayers

Describes the lethal blending effects of Proposition 1A (1986) and a 1964 Supreme Court decision, Reynolds vs Sims. Prop 1A gave California a full-time, professional,11-month Legislature. Reynolds vs Sims removed

Addresses a systematic weaponization of the environment and society, using scientific and social processes to create a tyranny over its citizens. Resources are routinely diverted from rural areas and industries

Addresses the effect of California leadership, whose laws and policies have systematically disenfranchised CA citizens, driving many to leave the state to be replaced by foreign nationals. The historically destructive

Focuses on Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhood and Schools Act, which reclassified non-violent felonies as misdemeanors and significantly reduced penalties for repeat offenses. The result of Prop 47 was to

Eco-terrorism, imposed by a governor whose radical environmental agenda contributes to devastating wildfires and prohibits use of valuable California natural resources, forces dependence instead on relief from the Federal government

Addresses California’s refusal to abide by U.S. Federal laws and the enhanced lawlessness resulting from state bills and laws that work to the detriment of California citizens. CA’s judicial system

Addresses additional violations of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution by all levels of California’s government failing to enforce laws that they themselves have imposed. The result has been Third

Focuses on a hyper-legislative process that produces unconstitutional California state laws that violate the Supremacy Clause. Coupled with an abdication of responsibility by elected leaders, the effect has been to